Vladimir’s Mustache – The Book Trailer

Made my profile picture on Facebook the cover of my new book: Check. Resisted the urge to send out a mass-email to everyone in my address book, announcing the availability of my new book: Check. Visited Amazon daily, then twice daily, then hourly, to check my sales ranking: Checkcheckcheckcheck. What else am I missing? Oh yes, the book trailer. Let’s check that off:

Blurbapalooza


My blogging abilities have diminished. Maybe five months ago, I meant to write something about Reed College — bye-bye, my soggy friend, I’ll miss you — and then, not long after, I meant to say a thing or two about Augsburg — hello, my snowy friend, I’m so happy you’d have me — but now even this sentiment has grown dated, as my first semester at the college is drawing to a close. More recently, I meant to post the final three blurbs collected for my forthcoming short story collection, Vladimir’s Mustache. But again, and again, and again, I did anything. Have I been thinking I’d get noticed and given a position with the SEC? The Justice Department? I can’t say, but I can try to make up for it. So here, all at once, a blurbapalooza:

From Jodee Stanley, the editor of Ninth Letter and first to publish my collection’s title story:

Stephan Clark’s stories span centuries and social classes, exploring Russian history in heartbreaking, breathtaking detail. Each tale in this marvelous collection combines an Old World gravitas with a contemporary edge, giving us characters that resonate as completely of their time, yet as familiar as our own friends and neighbors. You will find yourself lost, totally immersed in these stories – an experience you don’t want to miss.

From Ben Fountain, whose Brief Encounters with Che Guevara I loved:

Stephan Clark’s very fine story collection is a tour de force of historical imagination. Clark clearly knows the territory, and he brings it to life with an inventiveness and artistry that few writers can match. These wry, wonderful, often revelatory stories mark the debut of a truly gifted writer, and I look forward to reading more books by Stephan Clark.

And finally, from TC Boyle, boss of bosses and author of so many great story collections:

Elegant, classic stories that sift through history and paint a luminous portrait of an enduring cast of Russian characters. Clark is marvelously protean here, engaging multiple personalities and points of view, and his cold eye and ready wit shine through brilliantly.

My thanks to you all.

Karl Iagnemma on Vladimir’s Mustache

If blurbs were like children, it wouldn’t be fair to have any favorites, but if you could, I’d probably let this one stay out late and come home stinking of beer — but just this one time. Here’s what Karl Iagnemma said about my forthcoming story collection:

Vladimir’s Mustache is a thrilling discovery: dark, elegant fables that dissect the Russian soul, in a style that feels timeless yet utterly fresh. I read each story with a delicious sense of anticipation and dread. Stephan Clark is a marvelous writer, and a tender chronicler of the doomed.”

Karl’s short story “Zilkowski’s Theorem” is on my short list of all-time favorites and one I give to my students, who react to it with no less enthusiasm, when I want to show an example of a story told in the third-person close perspective:

Henderson slipped into the back of the half-full auditorium and settled into an empty chair, shielding his face with a tattered yellow notepad. Around him, mathematicians stood in groups of three and four, sipping coffee from Styrofoam cups and cracking jokes about variational calculus and Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory. Their dreary humor seemed perfectly suited to the auditorium, with its frayed orange carpeting and comfortless chairs and flickering fluorescent lights. So this is Akron, thought Henderson. It was neither better nor worse than he’d expected.

The conference was the same every year, the same three hundred people, the same dismal cities: Gdansk one year, then Belfast, now Akron. Where next—Mogadishu, perhaps? Teheran? Henderson recognized and disliked many of the faces he saw; he found these people infinitely more agreeable bound between the covers of journals, their moist handshakes and pungent breath eliminated, their grating voices smoothed by the uninflected diction of mathematics. Henderson ducked his head and scribbled idly on his notepad. He did not want any of his colleagues to notice him, but mostly he did not want to catch the eye of the speaker, Czogloz.

“Zilkowski’s Theorem” tells the story of a love triangle between mathematicians, and as the above passage shows — and the one below this confirms — it’s filled with the sort of wonderful details that bring a piece of fiction alive.

But even now Henderson kept the single remaining relic of his and Marya’s relationship—a pair of pink cotton panties—in the far reaches of his lower-right desk drawer. Some Friday afternoons, when the Evans Building was abandoned and the carillon had tolled its dirge, Henderson found himself closing his office door and leaning back in his armchair, into a slant of sunlight, with the panties crushed up under his chin. Although they’d been washed accidentally, years ago, sometimes Henderson thought he could smell Marya’s eastern-European tang of garlic and dried leaves, her scent. On the back of the panties, near the tag, was a sight that never failed to twist Henderson’s heart: the word MARYA penned in blurry blue ink. He thought he had never seen a name as beautiful or as tragic.

If you haven’t picked up On the Nature of Human Romantic Interaction, the collection that contains Zilkowski’s Theorem, you should. It was good enough to win the Paris Review’s first-ever Plimpton Prize — and have its film rights optioned by Brad Pitt’s production company, Plan B Entertainment.

Thanks Peculiar to Ken Kalfus

Many thanks to Ken Kalfus for reading an advance copy of my forthcoming story collection, Vladimir’s Mustache, and having these kind words to say:

All Hail Stephan Clark! With terrific gusto, insight, and compassion, Clark’s first book of short stories brilliantly illuminates the lives of men and women trapped in Russian history and the muddled post-Soviet present. Vladimir’s Mustache is a solid achievement, as well as a beguiling introduction to a new literary talent.

Ken’s Commissariat of Englightenment was one of the books I was reading when I started writing the first of the stories that went into my collection. More recently, I finished his A Disorder Peculiar to the Country, a book that does for divorce what Romeo & Juliet did for first love. One of my favorite sections involves the husband’s attempts to drive down the value of his wife’s 401k by secretly rolling over her investments into “those funds and stocks that were famous for being losers: the written-off, the faded, the infirm, the SEC-investigated, the collapsed, a mutual fund that unerringly chose hopeless IPOs.” Great, great stuff.

Vladimir’s Mustache and Other Stories

Introducing, Vladimir’s Mustache.

A webpage for the collection went up on Wednesday, complete with a blurb — the book’s first — from Brett Finlayson, who, along with Alexander Yates, helped make the collection’s longest story, The Castrato of St. Petersburg, much better prior to its being published in Salt Hill.

In addition to thanking Brett, I have to give a few words of appreciation to Sergey Maximishin, without whom I wouldn’t have this book cover. His photo shows a file of photographs of people executed during Stalin’s purges and is part of a longer photo story on Stalin that can be found here.

I considered a good number of images (and one illustration) for the cover, but nothing felt right, nothing separated itself from everything else, until I was directed to Sergey’s work by Carolyn Drake, whose photography is no less worthy of your attention.

I love how Sergey’s photo straddles two time periods, both the past and the present, and how, like a half-opened door in a horror film, it holds back as much as it reveals, making the viewer sit up higher in his chair, or lean off to one side, as if for a better view. It’s just great storytelling, really, and I’m so grateful that I was able to play a role in selecting it — which is one of the joys of publishing with a small press like Russian Life Books.

Now onto the galleys, which I suppose are a month or two away.

Best American Essays 2009-2010

It’s a little after ten a.m. at Portland International Airport, I’ve had my shoes scanned and remembered to put my belt back on, and now I’m on the other side of security, waiting for my flight to LA to board. I’m not the only one going to MLA: I saw a professor of Spanish cursing, in Spanish, at the self-check terminal earlier this morning.

I had an hour to kill before my flight, so I did what all Americans do: looked for a way to spend a few dollars. Powell’s had an outpost just down from my gate, so I stepped in there and browsed the sales table. It was there that I found a discounted Best American Essays 2009.

But I should back up a minute. Last year, back when I was still in Russia, I learned from Jodee Stanley, the editor of Ninth Letter, that an essay of mine, “My Year of European Underwear,” which ran in Vol. 4, No. 1 of Ninth Letter, had been named a “notable work” in Best American Essays 2010.

Good news, right? Especially as this was the first time I’d been so named. Well, when the anthology came out last fall, I flipped to the back and saw it was my ghostly double who had in fact been recognized for the first time: Stephen Clark. Same story, same magazine. But the author of this piece was Stephen, not Stephan Clark.

Been happening all of my life, so I should’ve been prepared for it. But I still couldn’t stop looking at it. C.J. Chivers, they got that right. Billy Collins and Ted Conover, yes. They even nailed Sandra Cisneros. But that other guy . . .

So this is what recognition feels like? Needless to say, I didn’t buy a copy of the anthology.

But now cut to today, the PDX Powell’s, and there I am flipping through the back pages of the 2009 edition of this same anthology, looking to see who I should be jealous of, and who do I find but Stephan Clark? For his essay “The Reno Hotel,” which ran in Salt Hill.

I suppose in another world, Stephen Clark is very depressed. In this one, I bought a book.

Kamkov the Astronomer and Other Stories

The Study of Meteors (1957)

A friend of mine recently wrote me an email to apologize for the long silence between us, catch me up on her latest travels, and inform me, oh by the way, at the end of a long paragraph, that she was pregnant. “You buried the lead!” I told her, before proceeding to do the very same thing in my next email to her by announcing that I’d had my collection of short stories, Kamkov the Astronomer and Other Stories, accepted for publication.

Russian Life Books will be the publisher. They’ve only recently begun publishing fiction, primarily Russian literature in translation. In the last year or two, they’ve come out with a translation of the soviet-era classic The Little Golden Calf and Peter Aleshkovsky’s Fish: A History of One Migration, which was short-listed for the Russian Booker Prize.

Russian Life is an offshoot of the magazine of the same name, which itself dates back, through a couple of different incarnations, to Soviet Life magazine, a periodical first released in 1956 under the sponsorship of the Soviet Union (a similar magazine, Amerika, was published at the same time, under American sponsorship, and distributed in the Soviet Union).

More to come in the run-up to the book’s release, which is scheduled for next winter.

Recommended Work: Greg Baxter

Greg Baxter’s short story “Dead-End MF” ran in the same issue of the Cincinnati Review as my “Kamkov the Astronomer,” and after reading only the first paragraph, I knew it was the work of a writer with a fearless voice:

First thing my unhappy ass does every morning is walk this fat chick’s smelly fucking poodle. I ran over her cat one night, and now she thinks she owns me. And that’s just the beginning. I’m her booty call. Every Friday, Saturday night, one hundred seventy pounds of mean, dejected African pussy. I weigh a very light and white one sixty, too.

Just recently, I discovered the Cincinnati Review has started a blog and that for their first monthly feature (now three months old and not yet followed by a second) they profiled Greg and included links to the above-story and another, Two Incidents in the Hindu Kush, about the war in Afghanistan.

As Brock Clarke, the fiction editor who selected Greg’s work, says:

They sound like they couldn’t be more different, but both stories have big things on their minds (war in one, race in the other) and both are entirely irreverent—brutal in places, hilarious in others—in their pursuit of these big things. I loved both of them. They’re exactly the kind of stories we want to publish at CR: stories that have something to say that runs counter to the way these things are normally said, stories that might get the writer and the publisher in trouble.

Greg, a Texan who has lived in Ireland these last ten years, apparently just had a memoir published with Penguin Ireland. Here’s an interview with the Irish Times about it and praise for it elsewhere.

(Photo lifted from the Irish Times. I’ll gladly take it down; just ask.)

Funny People: Alix Ohlin

I think there’s a worry that if it’s funny then perhaps there’s something slight about it. That it’s not as important as a deeply researched, earnest, historical novel, or a kind of humorless tale of contemporary life. I think there possibly was a moment in the ‘60s and ‘70s when the serious books tended to be pretty funny. I don’t know if that’s as true these days.

I came across this quote, pulled from a Black Book interview with the author Sam Lipsyte, on the Elegant Variation a couple of weeks back, and I’ve been meaning to respond to it in some depth, because it surprised me that Lipsyte would speak of humor as a second class citizen in the literary world. To me, it seems that literary fiction, at least since George Saunders inspired a thousand stories set in an economically underperforming amusement park, has been more comic than straight.

Am I wrong? And if I am, can we at least agree never to write a story in an amusement park again? I don’t care if you’re writing about a grandmother dying of cancer in a bar, I’ll consider it so long as the bar’s not inside an amusement park. Am I the only one who’s noticed this trend?

Anyways, however much I’d like to create an index of writers who use humor (the best of whom, yes, of course, are deadly serious) I’m afraid I’ll just have to mention one today: Alix Ohlin. I’d seen the name before, can’t remember where or how, but it was only today that I read something of hers, the story Stranger Things Have Happened.

Such a wonderful voice, full of humor and sadness, and all the scope and range of an Alice Munro story — a novel, really — with the voice of its vaguely omniscient narrator at a slight remove and somehow benevolent.

Good, good stuff. Like the movie Funny People, which I just saw.

Now back to work on my amusement park novel.

Cabbage Head (and two links)

I come home from my writing studio at five or six these days, with my brain feeling like a head of cabbage that’s been left out in the sun. That’s been left out in the sun and then kicked through the street by a gang of hooligan kids with various vitamin deficiencies and families who don’t love them. My task each day: finish that dissertation. Feed the hole with words. Drink more tea, maybe some instant coffee, don’t forget to eat your borsch, and then back to the hole. Day after day. Repeat, repeat, repeat.

What am I writing about? Let me try another question. Would I still be writing about the grotesque in post-war American literature if I had read the following — and really taken it to heart — when I took this subject up?

As a practical matter we commonly adhere to several tacit assumptions about ideas: that they can be clearly expressed; that they have kernels or cores in which all is tidy, compact, and organized; and that the goal of analysis is to set limits to them, creating sharply defined, highly differentiated, and therefore useful concepts. We assume that, however complex an idea may be, it is essentially coherent and that it can most profitably be discussed in an orderly and progressive way. The grotesque places all these assumptions in doubt (On the Grotesque: Strategies of Contradiction in Art and Literature).

Word of advice for those planning to write a dissertation: unless you’re a fan of Alice in Wonderland, chasing the inexpressible down a rabbit hole is only so much fun. Dangers include multiple Google searches that include the phrases “in rare individuals …” “… more garlic, Vitamin C, and …” “… this harmless, but uncommon condition …” and “… green leafy vegetables.”

So. In the fog of these last few weeks, I failed to say anything about two magazines that were actually kind enough to ask me if I had anything I might like to send their way. The first, MayDay, put out by the good folks at New American press, published an excerpt from my nearly finished novel, FlavAmerica. Only the excerpt won’t likely make the final draft. So this is like a deleted scene on the DVD director’s cut of the drastically different film version of the novel that’s being shrunk down to size owing to commercial concerns. You know?

The second is Connotation Press, which this month is guest-edited by Robert Clark Young, the author of the hilarious and beautifully written, One of the Guys, a novel that literally changed my life (I met my wife because of it; another story).

When Bob contacted me asking if I had any creative non-fiction available, I thought the well was dry, but then I remembered Touching Down, the first chapter of my on-again, off-again Ukraine book, a memoir-cum-travelogue-slash-work of new journalism-double slash-sociological study of masculinity and femininity in Ukraine and the United States, all of which was given the unwieldy title: My Year of European Underwear: Dispatches from the Shadows of Ukraine’s Marriage Agencies. I’m really glad this one found a home, because a lot of work went into it before I froze the project. If you enjoy this one, you can find the continuation of this essay in Ninth Letter. An intervening chapter ran in Swink and another appeared in Noo. (Both links available on the “Publications” page).